Footprint evaluation: final take!

It is time to review the goals I had decided to achieve during the quarter. Here's the list again:

1. walk to and from class everyday

2. eat more locally grown food

3. unplug electric devices I don't use

4. switch off useless lights

5. stop using the dryer for my clothes

1. As i mentioned earlier in the quarter, I gave up the part 'walking to class' pretty early, because I just could not be on time in class. I feel like I haven't done too bad on the 'walking home' part though, I'd say I walked home at least 70% of the time. The weather has not really helped motivation, thanks Bellingham spring!

2. I have intentionnally bought a lot of local food and been to the Famer's Market almost every saturday. I eat a lot of vegetables and generally cook at least once a day, so it was nice to eat fresh food!! Although it probably hurt my wallet a little bit more than expected, I guess it was worth the investment.

3. I also unplugged my devices most of the time, but since I do not really know how much money I spent on power every month, the improvement probably does not really reflect in my ecological footprint.

4. I tried really hard to switch off lights in my apartment when no one was in the rooms, but my 3 roommates did not really try to do it although i did talk to them a few times about it

5. Not using the dryer was pretty easy, since I have been doing it in the beginning, because I was scared all my clothes would shrink haha I definitely stopped using the dryer! Although I have no idea how it reflects on my

I started out with 3.3 planets, which was already small compared to other people in the class. I think that most of it was due to the fact that I flew a lot here and that I also accounted for my flights to come here and get home. As I did my reevaluation I ended up with 3 planets. I guess the plane trips did it all, as well as me not really knowing how much I spend on gas and electricity, since I live in Birnam Wood and do not directly pay the bills.

This is it, the end of the journey towards a more sustainable life. I must say it has been rather challenging. Some of my goals I have achieved, some others I had to review because they were impossible for me to realize. I have tried very hard to not take the easy way and consciously be more sustainable. I think that the measures I decided to take are not really easy to reflect on the footprint, and the plane has been the main reason why my footprint has not really decreased. I think I will keep most of the resolution for the next years, although the entire system is different in Switzerland, where most of the buses for example are powered with electricity and not power.

Update on Makower's Sustainability Standard for Business

As we all know, Makower, writer of the GE book we used in class, has been working on developing a standard for business regarding sustainability. Yes, ONE standard, pretty hard task.

On March 28th, he published an article giving an update on this well-kept secret about the standard. The company-level guidelines touch on environmental as well as social and corporate-government issues that could potentially be used by firms as well as government entities and agencies.

After getting some funds from organizations like StopWaste.org in 2003, the project had to be temporarily given up for a few years before taken on again in 2008. To make it simple to understand, Makower liked to describe is at "LEED for companies" (LEED originally has been created for buildings).

Makower only says so much: " The first draft of the standard has now been completed and is beginning a robust process of stakeholder feedback. The plan is to have a final version ready for the marketplace later this year." He also said it will be looking at the entire supply chain as a way to compare companies in their effort to be more sustainable.

The difference with the many standards that are already out there is that this is one of the few programs focusing on company-level. Also, it is accredited by third party evaluations and includes management peformance next to environmental and social issues for mainstream companies and not just small firms.

Since more will be published towards the end of the year, this is definitely an interesting idea to be kept an eye on.

article: http://www.greenbiz.com/blog/2010/05/27/new-sustainability-standard-business

Stand out in the green job hunt

On GreenBiz.com, I found that interesting article yesterday about finding "Green Jobs". Advice is coming from a headhunter specialized in corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability. Although it is addressed to MBAs apparently, I guess there are useful tips for recent graduates as well.

One of the things that really surprised me is that the green job offer increased by 80% between 2006 and 2007, but decreased by 57% between 2008 and 2009. Two main reasons for this: Obviously, there has been a bigger economic downturn in 2009 than firstly expected by the markets, and also, most of the jobs posted are not really fitted for graduates, more for people with at least five years of experience.

Advice given by the headhunter include looking for intermediate steps to attain the final goal of working with sustainability, and trying to earn some experience before reaching for this final goal. Also, the jobs are spread more widely now than they were a few years ago, since every company and every sector is trying to go green somehow. However, most of the jobs can be found for social marketing in companies, lifecycle analysis or in the non-corporate sector.

Have a look at the article if you are interested.

article: http://www.greenbiz.com/blog/2010/06/01/getting-ahead-pack-your-green-job-search?page=0,0

Flying green?

I look up things on Greenbiz.com a lot, and today I found that article about airlines. Since I've been planning my trip during the summer before I go home, I've bought a couple of plane tickets, which is why this article seemed especially interesting to me.

Greenopia made a ranking based on a six different criteria: fuel conservation practices, recycling habits, green food, progress on alternative fuel types, green building design and carbon offsets.

Due to its fleet that is on average 2 years old, Virgin ends up first in this ranking. Also, Greenopia says that Virgin has made many efforts to position itself as a green company in the airline business. Although many airlines have started to implement green ideas to reduce their footprint, Virgin has been able to rise the level even more, for example serving only fair trade coffee on their flights.

Second is local company Alaska Airlines, with an average fleet age of 3 years, thanks to its efforts to reduce fuel consumption, before Continental Airlines ranked third despite the average age of 9 years. This is mainly due to the fact that Continental has been very transparent about its practices and also used biofuel for its flights.

Good thing I bought two Virgin flights for the summer! =)

article: http://www.greenbiz.com/news/2010/06/02/virgin-continental-fly-high-green-airlines-rankings